Here are the main points raised by Legislator Chang Chi-kai(張啓楷) in the program, arranged chronologically:

1. Presidential Office Denies President's Explicit Statement on PRC's Timeline for Attacking Taiwan: Regarding President Lai Ching-te(賴清德)'s mention at a press conference about the possibility of the PRC using force against Taiwan in 2027, but with the Presidential Office subsequently clarifying that the President did not explicitly state this, Chang Chi-kai questioned whether this has caused public confusion and demanded clarification from Lai Ching-te.

2. Criticizes Lai Ching-te for Contradicting Trump and the U.S. Congress: Chang Chi-kai pointed out that Trump had repeatedly stated that a military unification would not occur during his presidency, and U.S. Congressional reports also suggested that it would not be in 2027. Lai Ching-te's statement, therefore, contradicts Trump and the U.S. Congress, creating unnecessary panic.

3. Questions the Increase of Defense Budget to 5% of GDP: In response to Lai Ching-te's article in the Wall Street Journal, mentioning that the defense budget should reach 5% of GDP, Chang Chi-kai pointed out that Taiwan's current defense budget already accounts for 3.3% of GDP. Raising it to 5% would cause hardship for the people. He urged the government to clearly explain how it would bring peace to Taiwan.

4. Emphasizes Preparing for War While Also Seeking to Avoid It: Chang Chi-kai believes that the government should not only continuously purchase weapons, but should also seek better ways to engage in dialogue with the other side to ensure cross-strait peace.

5. Points out the Delayed Delivery Issue of U.S. Arms Sales: Chang Chi-kai mentioned that Taiwan still has over NT$600 billion worth of outstanding arms purchases from the United States, including the critical F16V fighter jets that have yet to be delivered. He urged the government to first push the United States to fulfill the contracts.

6. Criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP(民主進步黨) Government for Centralizing Power and Money, While Pretending to Be Poor: He pointed out that the DPP government is centralizing power and money, and despite being wealthy, it pretends to be poor and steals money from local governments, which is wrong.

7. DPP Randomly Cuts Local Subsidies, Yet Blames the Opposition for Causing Trouble with Amendments: He criticized the DPP for cutting over NT$290 billion in important construction funds originally intended to subsidize local areas, such as school lunches and flood control. Now, the opposition parties are amending the law to try to restore the funds, but they are being blamed for causing trouble.

   • Example of Chiayi City: Chang Chi-kai stated that Chiayi City secured an increase of NT$6.6 billion in general allocation funds, but the DPP government cut NT$6.9 billion in subsidies to Chiayi City, questioning whether it was bullying the residents of Chiayi City.
   • Example of Taichung City: The Taichung South Line MRT is already under construction, but the DPP cut the NT$6 billion subsidy to Taichung City to just NT$160 million, which is outrageous.

8. Believes Amending the "Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures" is to Implement the Division of Financial Powers and Responsibilities Between the Central and Local Governments: He stated that the purpose of amending the "Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures" is to correct the phenomenon of centralizing power and money, so that local governments have sufficient financial resources for autonomous development. Currently, the central government takes 75%, while local governments can only share 25%, leaving local governments very impoverished.

9. The Executive Yuan's Reconsideration Motion Demonstrates Arrogance of Power: Chang Chi-kai stated that the Lai Ching-te government has proposed eight reconsideration motions in just over a year, far exceeding the total number of times by all previous Presidents of the Executive Yuan. He criticized Cho Jung-tai(卓榮泰) for creating division and conflict.

10. Questions the Use of the "Anti-Infiltration Act" as a Tool to Suppress Dissent: Regarding the detention of Hsu Chun-ying(徐春鶯), the head of the New Residents Committee, Chang Chi-kai questioned whether the prosecutors are investigating her under the "Anti-Infiltration Act" because she supports the Taiwan People's Party, TPP(台灣民眾黨), and criticized the lack of clear evidence of instructions and funding from the Chinese side.