Here's the translation of the article into English, with the specified terms translated according to the provided table:

• Questions and Defenses Regarding the Hsu Chun-ying(徐春鶯) Incident:
  • The video raises questions about the investigation by prosecutors into Hsu Chun-ying(徐春鶯) for allegedly violating the Anti-Infiltration Law and receiving instructions from China to campaign for Ko Wen-je(柯文哲)'s candidacy for Taipei Mayor and President, stating that concrete evidence is needed.
  • It emphasizes that Hsu Chun-ying(徐春鶯), as the Director of the New Immigrants Committee of the Taiwan People's Party (TPP), has long been involved in social welfare and that seeking knowledge from various sectors during elections is normal behavior.
  • It argues that everyone should enjoy the presumption of innocence before being convicted and that forced confessions should not be used.
• Criticism of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Media's Actions:
  • It criticizes President Lai's national security action plan as ominous and connects the Hsu Chun-ying(徐春鶯) incident with the Anti-Infiltration Law.
  • It refutes Chou Hsuan's accusation that the TPP supports fraud, emphasizing that the TPP supports due legal process.
  • It questions Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislators and assistants for presuming to be grand justices and criticizes the Liberty Times for prejudging the case and implying Hsu Chun-ying(徐春鶯)'s guilt without providing clear evidence.
  • It argues that campaigning for specific Ko Wen-je or party candidates in Taiwan should not be equated with a crime.
• Emphasis on Legal Process and Protection of Rights:
  • It calls for Taiwan to maintain due legal process and not equate suspicion of a crime with guilt to infringe on the rights of the parties involved.
  • It expresses the desire to prevent any political interference in the judiciary.