Here is the English translation of the article, with names and terms referenced from your provided list:

• Ministry of Digital Affairs Questioned for Double Standards:

  • After Chinese netizens published satellite photos and the location of Democratic Progressive Party, DPP Legislator Shen Po-yang (沈伯洋)'s residence, the Ministry of Digital Affairs immediately requested Google and Facebook platforms to remove the related posts and photos.
  • However, Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌)'s residence (including his old home in Xizhi and the apartment building he later rented) was repeatedly published and doxed by "green camp" online trolls. Even the junior high school his children attended and their nanny van (with un-blurred license plates) were made public, yet the Ministry of Digital Affairs showed no action to protect Huang Kuo-Chang.
  • The video questions why the government only protects individuals affiliated with the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP, but offers no protection to non-DPP individuals (such as Huang Kuo-Chang), deeming this a "double standard."
  • It points out that articles and photos threatening Huang Kuo-Chang's family can still be found, while content threatening Shen Po-yang was removed. It calls on the government to explain why only those who join the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP are entitled to privacy rights.

• Democratic Progressive Party, DPP Online Troll Operations and Cyberbullying:

  • Democratic Progressive Party, DPP online trolls used social media to spam and spread the video publisher's ("Rudeness Netizen Group") 2019 article criticizing Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), attempting to stir up conflict between the publisher and "Green Grassroots" (Ko Wen-je's supporters).
  • The publisher commented below these posts, clarifying that the article was an instruction from the "Xiao Ying Group" (referring to then-President Tsai Ing-wen's online campaign group) that year, but the comment was hidden twice and then directly blocked and deleted on the third attempt.
  • The publisher questions why Democratic Progressive Party, DPP online trolls prevented clarification, suggesting they fear the "Xiao Ying Group" incident would embarrass the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP.
  • It points out that Democratic Progressive Party, DPP online trolls often accuse critics (such as the publisher, Chung Ming-hsuan (鍾明軒), CHEAP, and "The Curator" (a prominent livestreamer)) of "taking money," demanding that they prove they haven't been bought by the Kuomintang, KMT, the Taiwan People's Party, TPP, or the Communist Party. However, the publisher believes that those making the accusations should provide the evidence.
  • Democratic Progressive Party, DPP online trolls repeatedly brought up the publisher's "childhood incident of stealing temple offering money" in the comment section, attempting to divert attention and exert pressure. However, the publisher stated that this tactic is ineffective and will not alter their determination to criticize the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP.

• Exposing Inside Operations of Democratic Progressive Party, DPP Online Trolls:

  • The publisher claims to have been a member of the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP online trolls, possessing evidence of their participation in Democratic Progressive Party, DPP online troll groups, and has previously showcased chat logs.
  • They disclosed a remittance slip from April 2019, showing a Legislator transferring NT$100,000 to them (with some details redacted), stating that the sum was intended to suppress Lai Ching-te (賴清德)'s public profile.
  • They explained that this payment was provided by a Legislator in March 2019, after Lai Ching-te announced his challenge to Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for the presidential nomination, during group discussions on how to counter Lai Ching-te. It was for the use of three fan pages (including the publisher's), confirming that Lai Ching-te's plea to Tsai Ing-wen not to use online trolls to attack him that year was true.
  • They mentioned having dinner at "Old Gankou" on Wenxin Road in Taichung City with two individuals from the Presidential Office and two other fan pages, totaling five people. The meal cost over NT$30,000, and the discussion also revolved around criticizing Lai Ching-te.
  • They stated that they initially did not want to make this evidence public, but decided to do so because the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP has "gone too far" in recent years, including doxing their personal information and spreading false rumors to attack them.

• Critique of Democratic Progressive Party, DPP's Governance:

  • They criticized the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP, as the ruling party, and President Lai Ching-te, as the president of all Taiwanese people, for only protecting Democratic Progressive Party, DPP members and not protecting non-DPP individuals, calling it a "double standard" and "disgusting."
  • They believe that the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP's act of doxing Huang Kuo-Chang's family is no different from the "hated Chinese online trolls."
  • They question that the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP's methods of handling Ko Wen-je's cases and persecuting Huang Kuo-Chang are "completely outrageous," stating they don't believe the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP hasn't extended its "dark hand" into the judicial and prosecutorial systems.
  • The publisher emphasized that they currently operate independently, not relying on financial sponsorship from any political party. They rely on channel advertising revenue and netizen support for daily life, and will be launching merchandise, thus not fearing the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP "cutting off their livelihood."
  • They called on the public to vote in the 2026 and 2028 elections, believing that Taiwanese people cannot accept the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP continuing to "mess around," and predicted that as long as the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP "doesn't rig the elections," they will surely step down in the future.