Here's a summary of the arguments presented in the video:

• Regarding the Revision and Reconsideration Motion of the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財劃法):

  • Criticizes the Executive Yuan's inconsistent attitude towards the revision of the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures, delaying the submission of its version for a year and consistently failing to provide trial calculations.
  • Condemns the Executive Yuan's frequent submission of Reconsideration Motions, calling it the cabinet with the most Reconsideration Motions in history, interested only in starting fights, unwilling to communicate, and simply acting irresponsibly.
  • Criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP Caucus for reviewing a non-existent war criminal provision in the Finance Committee, which even the Ministry of Finance opposed, indicating a lack of communication between the Executive Yuan and the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP Caucus.
  • Questions whether the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP government is concentrating power and money, keeping too much authority in the central government and unwilling to devolve funding to local governments, violating the spirit of local autonomy.
  • Criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP government for drastically cutting local subsidies while blaming local governments in return.
  • Asserts that the Taiwan People's Party, TPP firmly opposes the Reconsideration Motion and will reject the Executive Yuan's proposed Reconsideration Motion of the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures, not allowing the Democratic Progressive Party, DPP government to squander taxpayers' money.

• Regarding the National Defense Budget and Cross-Strait Relations:

  • Questions President Lai Ching-te(賴清德)'s inconsistent stance before and after the election, continuously increasing the national defense budget after being elected and intending to declare Taiwan to be in a state of quasi-war.
  • Questions whether the Republic of China Armed Forces (國軍)'s fill rate is low, wondering if there are enough personnel to operate the newly added weapons.
  • Argues that peace should rely on dialogue and exchange, not solely on military weapons, and criticizes Lai Ching-te for provoking the other side, failing the people of Taiwan.
  • Believes that the national defense budget should be reasonably increased while maintaining fiscal discipline, but questions whether the massive purchase of weapons is truly suitable for Taiwan's use.
  • Criticizes the delayed delivery of new fighter jets and the unclear progress of the Hai Kun submarine, questioning the Lai Ching-te government's determination to defend the country and whether it is turning the "護國神山" (protecting national mountain, referring to TSMC) into arms dealers.
  • Argues that military personnel's compensation and benefits should be improved to effectively deter the Chinese Communist Party.
  • Demands that President Lai Ching-te explain the source of the NT$1.25 trillion national defense budget and why he is spreading the claim of "Beijing's military unification of Taiwan in 2027," creating social panic.
  • Questions President Lai Ching-te for contradicting Donald Trump, the United States Congress, and President of the Executive Yuan Cho Jung-tai(卓榮泰).
  • Criticizes President Lai Ching-te for being dictatorial, failing to communicate with the public and not respecting the Legislative Yuan.
  • Expresses concern that excessive expansion of the national defense budget will crowd out funding for infrastructure, social welfare, and economic development, making people's lives difficult.
  • Reminds President Lai Ching-te that after Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke, Japan's Sanae Takaichi has shifted her stance, reducing her focus on the Taiwan issue, and questions whether President Lai is misjudging the situation.
  • States that the Taiwan People's Party, TPP supports a reasonable national defense budget, but will strictly review it and demand a prior investigation of military procurement items that have been paid for but not yet delivered.

• Regarding the Hsu Chun-ying (徐春鶯) Incident:

  • Criticizes the investigation and judicial authorities and the media for prejudging the case and engaging in political manipulation of Ms. Hsu Chun-ying(徐春鶯).
  • Emphasizes that the presumption of innocence and due legal process should be respected before a conviction.
  • Criticizes the Ministry of Interior for misinterpreting the law, using the Nationality Act to interpret the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, suppressing the rights of new immigrants.
  • Argues that Taiwan should address issues such as low birth rate, low wages, and economic recession, rather than engaging in internal strife.
  • Emphasizes that Taiwan needs unity, survival, and future development, not political struggle and internal friction.

• Overall State of the Government:

  • Believes that the Lai Ching-te government and the Cho Jung-tai cabinet are engaging in all-out war, starting a war internally with the opposition parties over the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures and even resorting to illegal and disorderly conduct; and escalating cross-strait tensions externally, forcing people to tighten their belts and live in hardship.
  • Questions whether the Lai Ching-te government and the Cho Jung-tai are already engaging in all-out war.