影片摘要
2026/01/10
#校園自殺防治研習越來越多，成果卻愈來愈差，到底哪裡出了問題？
- Increased Resource Input, Yet Worsening Outcomes: Over the past three years, the Education Bureau has continuously increased its budget, training, and promotional activities for campus suicide prevention. However, students' mental health has not improved; instead, it shows a worsening trend.
- Data-Driven, Not Outcome-Driven: The report data submitted by the Education Bureau is "excellent" and scores "perfect," indicating performance in its duties. However, these activities and data do not effectively reflect or enhance the actual effectiveness of student self-harm prevention, demonstrating that the Education Bureau focuses merely on superficial data presentation rather than actual intervention outcomes.
- Insufficient Tracking of Intervention Effectiveness for High-Risk Students: Questions have been raised regarding the Education Bureau's inability to effectively track the effectiveness of interventions for high-risk student cases, particularly whether these cases have truly improved. The Education Bureau's response ("For some severe cases, it might take a bit longer, but for other general students, after counseling for certain situations, the effects are usually quite good") is seen as a lack of concrete effectiveness data and systematic tracking.
- Lack of Effectiveness Evaluation and Tracking Mechanisms for Policies: Despite numerous prevention policies, there is a lack of effective tracking mechanisms to evaluate their actual effectiveness. This prevents understanding whether policies achieve their intended goals and further increasing protective levels.
- Swedish Model as a Successful Example: Sweden's school suicide prevention process is regarded as a successful model, characterized by:
- The prevention process being integrated as part of the overall school administrative system.
- Each reported case having a clear person responsible for tracking.
- Standardized processes with deadlines, records, and reporting.
- After implementing school-wide mental health interventions, student self-harm frequency decreased by approximately 30% on average within three months, and the proportion of repeat self-harmers decreased by approximately 29%.
- Demand for the Education Bureau to Clearly Commit to Reform Proposals: In response to the aforementioned issues, the Education Bureau is required to adopt the following improvement measures:
- Integrate mental health programs and establish a single coordinating window: Consolidate all relevant mental health programs and set up a unified point of contact responsible for overall coordination and management.
- Refer to international cases to establish a networked plan: Draw upon successful international examples, such as Sweden, to build a more comprehensive, networked prevention plan.
- Submit a concrete improvement plan: The Director of the Education Bureau is required to submit a concrete improvement plan before the general consultation.