The following is a summary of the claims made by "Little Lee Under the Overpass" in a live stream video on December 2, 2025:

• Regarding Lee Yu-I(李友宜)'s Withdrawal from the Party:

  • Questioning the Claim of "Unfair Primary": Arguing that primary registration has not even begun in New Taipei City and many other districts, so there is no basis for claims of unfairness.
  • Emphasizing the TPP's Open and Transparent Nomination Process: Calling on the party headquarters to more clearly explain the content of the nomination process.
  • Explaining the TPP's Lack of Incumbent Protection: Stating that, by design, even incumbent councilors will not be nominated if they lose to challengers in the primary.
  • Questioning Criticism of the Pledge: Arguing that criticizing the pledge to be signed after the primary when primary registration has not even begun is illogical.
  • Believing the Pledge Content is Reasonable: Giving an example of signing a pledge to guarantee no criminal record as a matter of course and disagreeing with the claim that "the pledge is a black box."
  • Clarifying That the Pledge Does Not Prohibit Public Disclosure of Primary Results: The media will disclose the results, so there is no prohibition on public disclosure.
  • Emphasizing That He is a Member of the Taipei City Local Recommendation Committee and Handles All Data, Believing the Process is Sufficiently Fair.
  • Questioning Lee Yu-I's(李友宜)'s Lack of Active Pursuit: Asking if Lee Yu-I(李友宜) has ever actively pursued nomination and mentioning that the pledge includes agreement with the primary process and results.
  • Questioning Failure to Attend Huang Kuo-Chang(黃國昌)-Related Activities: If standing with Huang Kuo-Chang(黃國昌) is considered fair, why not actively participate in related activities.
  • Questioning Who is the Aggressor and Who is the Victim: Questioning the failure to clearly identify the aggressor and victim in the public's angry criticism of the party central.
  • Criticizing Unauthorized Criticism: Believing that unauthorized individuals should not speak on behalf of the parties involved and should not create conflict or block others' paths.

• Regarding the "Four Great Guesses" Nickname:

  • Disliking the Nickname: Believing that packaging four female party members into a group is condescending to individual effort.
  • Believing it Should Not Be Linked to Political Forces: It should not be linked to terms such as "the king's men."

• Regarding Local Engagement:

  • Believing the Controversy Stems from Poor Local Engagement: Emphasizing that if local engagement is solid and the strength is great, there will be no controversy over the fairness of the primary.
  • Proposing Standards for Judging Whether Local Engagement is Serious: Whether supporters can be convened, whether activities can be held, etc.
  • Naming Some Party Members Who Have Not Actively Engaged Locally: Asking whether some party members have continued to serve locally after losing elections.

• Regarding Internal Party Discussions:

  • Criticizing the "Little Prodigy" Phenomenon in the Party: Referring to some party members who are unwilling to take responsibility, unwilling to work hard, and only criticize and fill positions everywhere.
  • Calling on Party Members to Reject "Little Prodigies": They should speak with strength, not empty talk.
  • Emphasizing That the Party's Will Comes from Common Discussion: The party's will does not come from the top, but from the common discussion of voters and supporters.
  • Calling on Party Members to Make Suggestions in Formal Meetings: Questioning why specific suggestions are not made in the Central Committee or party affairs meetings.
  • Not Understanding Party Members Criticizing the TPP on Green Camp Programs: Believing that this does not help the TPP.

• Appeal to Voters:

  • Urge and Encourage Candidates: Please use the perspective of supporters to urge and encourage candidates.
  • Support Candidates Who Are Endorsed: If a candidate's performance is in line with approval, they should be seriously helped to get elected.
  • Work Hard with the Approved Candidates: Become partners of the candidates, introduce more people to get to know them, and win more votes.

• Regarding Bottled Water and Hot Pot Incidents:

  • Believing They Are Vulgar and Boring Discussions: Such events should not be used as bargaining chips for political discussion.
  • Disagreeing with the practice of criticizing the TPP on green media.

• Expectations for Oneself:

  • Please Use the Highest Standards to Examine Yourself: If you do not do what you guarantee, or say something and do not do it, please criticize severely.