好的，這是一份針對影片內容的主張統整：

Video Main Claims Summary

The video's central argument revolves around questioning and criticizing the conduct of prosecutors during the investigation of the "Jinghua City Case," specifically regarding the acquisition and execution of search warrants, alleging abuse of power and a lack of procedural justice.

I. Prosecutors' Illegal and Abusive Conduct During the Investigation of the "Jinghua City Case":

• Request for Prosecutor Evaluation Incident (02:12-05:02, 02:41-03:13, 21:55-22:20)
  • Ko Wen-je(柯文哲), accompanied by lawyer Cheng Sheng-yuan(鄭深元), filed a request with the Ministry of Justice for a prosecutor evaluation prior to the verdict in the Jinghua City Case, seeking to hold numerous prosecutors accountable for their "misconduct" during the investigation.
  • The lawyer pointed out that Prosecutor Lin Chun-yen(林俊言), while investigating this case, deliberately misinterpreted laws and concealed favorable evidence, despite knowing that floor area ratio incentives fall within the scope of administrative discretion. He also applied to the court for a search warrant in an exaggerated and misleading manner.
  • This led to the court issuing a search warrant based on incomplete information, constituting a "deceptive search warrant" and violating the Code of Criminal Procedure.
  • Prosecutors also violated Article 98 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by intimidating witnesses or using improper